Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity time dilation is a difference of elapsed time between two events as measured by observers either moving relative to each other or differently situated from a gravitational mass or masses. Time dilation explains why two working clocks will report different times after different accelerations. For example astronauts return from missions having aged slightly less then, had they remained on earth.
Also the comparison of muon lifetimes at different speeds is interesting. In the laboratory, slow muons are produced; and in the atmosphere, very fast moving muons are introduced by cosmic rays. The cosmic ray produced muon traveling at 98% of the speed of light is about five times longer, in agreement with observations.
So speed acceleration slows down time run and vise a versa, for time acceleration speed must be reduced.
Lack of time is a problem, about which the majority of earth’s society is very concerned. Many scientists claim that time started to run faster on earth, and people notice it, because it has changed radically. This may be caused by the climate system changes, including changes in atmospheric composition (e.g., increased concentrations of greenhouse gases), industrial era, solar luminosity, volcanic eruptions, and variations in Earth's orbit around the Sun. As a result, our planet changes the orbit towards the sun, getting more closer. The closer a planet is to the Sun, the slower it will spin around it. With the decrease of the speed, the time run is to be accelerated. And it is today’s reality.
One needs too much effort too feel and realise every moment of life. Reality seems more to be a psychedelic movement, frozen in a mass hallucination
"Life is an effort in time." Freedom. I. Questions unanswered.
"... All the foundations of our conscious moral life, all the questions of meaning that you have so well formulated: who am I? Why am I? Etc., lie in an area about which we can say this: this is an area of what you can’t know in principle, you can’t know in advance, suppose, imagine from existing ideas and logical possibilities of thought, enter a definition. This can be known only by going the path yourself. On yourself and in yourself.
- Does this apply only to people with advanced intelligence? After all, there are people who want to be led.
“But then, put out the candles.”
- Yes, but there are many such people.
- That's that. If I define human life as an effort in time, by doing so I affirm that in life there will always be a hierarchy for every given moment. The lesser made the effort, the greater. And this is not a Question of democracy, because democracy assumes equality of initial efforts, and the question is fatal. It is impossible to equally divide what is not there, what only a person has to learn and discover with his or her test. And in this sense, there is some kind of fair and unfair hierarchy at every given moment, because at every given moment we have a total life. Therefore, there are rules of wisdom worked out by society, which, for example, prescribe patience for some: wait, not in a hurry (they do not allow you to immediately commit an aggressive act). You yourself can’t do it like others, obey, take as an example, etc. "(" Department ")
... In the language of philosophy, such an effort is usually called transcending. By transcending experience, existing orders, existing psychic mechanisms, etc. Here is some indication that in man, besides what we could describe as naturally existing, there is also a certain acting force pushing him to go beyond these limits and transcending. Transcending to what? But to nothing; since, according to the meaning of the symbolic concepts that I introduced before, there are no such objects. That is: there is transcendence, but there is no transcendental, there are no transcendental objects. Kant, with his Critique of Pure Reason, established this fact forever, which, of course, existed before it was established - that there are no such transcendental objects, including God. There are symbols by which we denote the consequences of the action of some force in ourselves.
Therefore, the most meaningful definition of freedom (and the concept of freedom is directly related to the individual) is the definition of freedom as something in us that does not depend on us, which is transcendental in the sense that it never has any concrete grounds, which we could find in any particular culture surrounding the individual.
"... Personal structures are not the structures of our individuality - this is a different concept, including in the psychological sense. Just, maybe, to the extent that we act personally, we are not individual, not at all individual. And the ability to act individually, but not standardly (of course, this is a different contrast of concepts), there is the ability to find oneself in the sphere of personality structures, that is, personal actions transcend - I have already used this term - any specific orders. And therefore, in fact, it recognizes among them, as a special one. So, this type of action supports a leaky being, that is, a being that is organized in such a way as to be reproduced as being, peace, cosmos, if you like, only if there is effort on the part of the person , now already during the conversation in the language enriched by us, with the levels of transcending as a personal act, or the presence of a personal structure. there are people who are able to act personally, that is, capable of reproducing this setting, for example, moral law, legal law, etc. at the level of their own inherent vital mortal need, risk and responsibility, understanding, etc. And if not of these, a certain number of personalities, or at least one personality, these establishments are not reproduced, that is, the cosmos dies. In old mythologies, this thing is not that it was well understood, it was well worked out in rituals. After all, ritual actions were considered not just worship of some god, and from this point of view they are stupid in the eyes of an enlightened person, but they were considered as actions involved in the reproduction of the cosmos, ordered in the way it is ordered: and if these actions do not, then the cosmos will fall apart. "(" Philosophy and Personality ")
He (Descartes) and led through all his philosophy one strange, at first glance, thing that is also an ontological postulate: one who can inspire himself in peace alone in the inspiration of the naked moment of truth (that is hardly
Merab Mamardashvili
